🌎 International equity

Navigating Vesting Schedule Changes in Public Companies

Small business owners navigating the complexities of compensation packages often look to larger public companies for industry trends and best practices. One such area that has seen significant evolution is the vesting schedule, with public companies now shifting from the traditional four-year plan to a three-year model.

Understanding these changes is critical for small business owners who aim to remain competitive in talent acquisition while managing financial health. In this comprehensive exploration, we will dissect the intricacies of vesting schedule adjustments and provide insights on adapting to this new landscape.

Understanding Vesting Schedules

Before we plunge into the specifics of the shift, a foundational understanding of what a vesting schedule entails is essential. Vesting dictates the transfer of full ownership of employer-provided assets over time. For example, with stock options or retirement contributions, an employee might become fully vested after a period of service, frequently four years. This incentivizes employee retention and alignment with company goals.

The Shift to 3-Year Vesting in Public Companies

Remarkably, the vesting landscape at public firms has undergone a transformation, with some companies now opting for a three-year vesting schedule. Formerly, the '4 and 1' model was prevalent, offering a 3 year vesting period that starts after a one year  "cliff" (a period of time the employee works for the company before vesting of their options begins). The 3-year schedule squashes this into an even shorter time period.

Reasons Behind the Shorter Vesting Period

Companies are shortening vesting periods to decrease the equity granted to employees, possibly as an adaptation to more dynamic work environments where long-term commitments are less common. Millennials and Generation Z workers are more likely to change jobs for better prospects, making faster vesting an attractive perk for new entrants to the workforce.

Your journey to better, clearer international equity practices starts here

Impact on Grant Sizes

Comparison of Grant Sizes Over Different Vesting Durations

It's not merely the time reduction that's intriguing; the alteration in vesting schedules has a direct impact on the size of grants offered by companies. A $100K grant spread over four years is now often reduced to an $85K grant over three years. This tactic offers a more appealing annual value to employees, yet it reduces the total cost to the company, aligning with the need for fiscal prudence.

Benefits and Drawbacks for Employees and Companies

From the employee perspective, the annual vesting of a three-year plan can seem more palatable and rewarding. However, the reduction in total grant size is a direct attempt by companies to scale back costs, especially in times of economic uncertainty. This strategy demands that employees stay through the entire three-year period to maximize their benefits, which could impact overall job satisfaction and retention.

Managing Burn Rate Effectively Through Shorter Vesting Periods

Companies utilizing the three-year vesting plan often find it advantageous in managing the rate at which they grant equity. A shorter vesting duration can help in maintaining a lower rate after an IPO or during capital generation phases. It offers flexibility without compromising the appeal of equity compensation.

Your journey to better, clearer international equity practices starts here

Implications for Small Business Owners

Effect on Small Businesses and Their Compensation Strategies

The shift to three-year vesting in the public arena inevitably seeps into the strategies of smaller enterprises. Understanding the competitive edge that compensation packages offer and adjusting them accordingly is paramount. Small businesses should analyze the benefits of a shorter vesting schedule in attracting top talent, balanced against the potential for increased turnover.

Adapting to the New Vesting Norm

To thrive in this transformed environment, small business owners must be agile. Implementing technology that automates and streamlines the tracking of vesting schedules, as well as offering more non-equity incentives, can be part of a winning adaptation strategy. Additionally, conducting regular market research and benchmarking to ensure alignment with industry norms can pay dividends.

Aligning Employee Compensation with Industry Trends

To avoid falling behind, small business owners should meticulously review and potentially overhaul their compensation packages to align with emerging trends. This could involve more frequent (perhaps annual) performance-based assessments leading to accelerated vesting or alternatives to equity, such as profit sharing or bonuses, that resonate more with the younger workforce.


The transition from four-year to three-year vesting schedules in public companies is a nuanced shift that presents both opportunities and challenges. It’s vital for small business owners to remain vigilant, adaptive, and strategic in their approach to compensation. By educating themselves on the implications of this change and taking proactive measures to align with industry standards, small businesses can preserve their competitive edge and continue to attract and retain top talent.

Your journey to better, clearer international equity practices starts here